PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DESGX vs. VITPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DESGX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS ESG Core Equity Fund (DESGX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DESGX achieves a 14.68% return, which is significantly higher than VITPX's 11.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DESGX has underperformed VITPX with an annualized return of 13.43%, while VITPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.


DESGX

1D
-0.03%
1M
6.82%
YTD
14.68%
6M
14.99%
1Y
37.64%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
13.43%

VITPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.89%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DESGX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DESGX
DWS ESG Core Equity Fund
14.68%18.92%23.55%26.68%-15.56%28.99%19.13%28.18%-17.30%13.02%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.99%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DESGX and VITPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2005

0.95

The correlation between DESGX and VITPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DESGX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DESGX
DESGX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DESGX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS ESG Core Equity Fund (DESGX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DESGXVITPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.05

2.47

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.19

3.37

+0.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.44

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

3.38

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.08

15.60

+3.49

DESGX vs. VITPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DESGX Sharpe Ratio is 3.05, which is comparable to the VITPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DESGX and VITPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DESGXVITPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

2.47

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.78

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.83

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.51

+0.03

Drawdowns

DESGX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DESGX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than VITPX's maximum drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DESGX and VITPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESGXVITPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.26%

-55.28%

-2.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-8.92%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.26%

-19.35%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.01%

-25.31%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.68%

-34.99%

+0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-8.02%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.93%

+0.09%

Volatility

DESGX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison

DWS ESG Core Equity Fund (DESGX) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) at 2.94%. This indicates that DESGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VITPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESGXVITPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

2.94%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

9.19%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.71%

12.19%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.35%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.23%

18.41%

-0.18%

DESGX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DESGX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

DESGX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison

DESGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than VITPX's 2.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DESGX
DWS ESG Core Equity Fund
5.02%5.76%7.94%2.80%4.21%12.80%4.06%7.61%21.12%3.53%6.49%7.25%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.24%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DESGX and VITPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DESGX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to VITPX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DESGX dropped -58.26% vs VITPX's -55.28%.

DESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DESGX and VITPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer