PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L) and JPM USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DEMD.L is traded in USD, while JPAS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JPAS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMD.L achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly higher than JPAS.L's 2.15% return.


DEMD.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
-3.70%
6M
12.00%
YTD
15.53%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
16.38%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
8.84%

JPAS.L

1D
0.56%
1M
0.55%
6M
2.10%
YTD
2.15%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DEMD.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
15.53%20.91%5.26%21.17%-12.75%13.36%-6.14%7.90%
JPAS.L
JPM USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.15%5.32%5.49%4.53%1.03%0.46%1.85%-21.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMD.L and JPAS.L is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMD.L
DEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

JPAS.L
JPAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JPAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L) and JPM USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEMD.LJPAS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

3.90

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.01

14.90

-6.90

DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is higher than the JPAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMD.L and JPAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMD.L drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, which is greater than JPAS.L's maximum drawdown of -24.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMD.L and JPAS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMD.LJPAS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.46%

-24.25%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.63%

-1.21%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-1.21%

-13.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.69%

-2.53%

-25.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.71%

-4.18%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-16.59%

+6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

0.32%

+2.25%

Volatility

DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to JPM USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPAS.L) at 1.37%. This indicates that DEMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMD.LJPAS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

1.37%

+3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

3.69%

+8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

4.31%

+9.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.06%

4.76%

+10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

9.93%

+6.74%

DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMD.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than JPAS.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMD.L vs. JPAS.L - Dividend Comparison

DEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, while JPAS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMD.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.72%4.42%7.88%6.68%7.48%4.20%4.51%4.13%4.39%1.98%1.68%4.75%
JPAS.L
JPM USD Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMD.L and JPAS.L have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPAS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPAS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEMD.L.

DEMD.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while JPAS.L is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for DEMD.L and 0.18% for JPAS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMD.L and JPAS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer