PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEM.L vs. DGRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DEM.L is traded in GBp, while DGRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEM.L achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than DGRA.L's 7.19% return.


DEM.L

1D
0.31%
1M
6.29%
YTD
19.41%
6M
19.10%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
12.42%

DGRA.L

1D
0.12%
1M
4.46%
YTD
7.19%
6M
5.39%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEM.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF
19.41%12.71%11.70%18.04%-2.59%15.16%-6.66%17.84%-1.94%14.47%
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
7.19%5.03%20.29%12.77%2.58%26.46%9.27%23.93%-1.02%15.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DEM.L and DGRA.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2016

0.46

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEM.L
DGRA.L

Financial Services

25.5%
10.7%

Technology

16.7%
28.9%

Industrials

11.7%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
8.5%

Basic Materials

6.5%
3.1%

Communication Services

5.5%
8.6%

Real Estate

5.0%

-

Utilities

4.8%
0.4%

Energy

4.8%
5.3%

Healthcare

2.0%
15.0%

Financial Services

DEM.L
25.5%
DGRA.L
10.7%

Technology

DEM.L
16.7%
DGRA.L
28.9%

Industrials

DEM.L
11.7%
DGRA.L
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

DEM.L
8.9%
DGRA.L
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DEM.L
8.7%
DGRA.L
8.5%

Basic Materials

DEM.L
6.5%
DGRA.L
3.1%

Communication Services

DEM.L
5.5%
DGRA.L
8.6%

Real Estate

DEM.L
5.0%
DGRA.L

-

Utilities

DEM.L
4.8%
DGRA.L
0.4%

Energy

DEM.L
4.8%
DGRA.L
5.3%

Healthcare

DEM.L
2.0%
DGRA.L
15.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEM.L
DEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRA.L
DGRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEM.LDGRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

3.77

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.63

12.10

+4.53

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the DGRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEM.L and DGRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEM.LDGRA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

1.85

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.92

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.94

-0.33

Drawdowns

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEM.L drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than DGRA.L's maximum drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM.L and DGRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEM.LDGRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-23.29%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-5.57%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

-18.00%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.48%

-18.00%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

0.00%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-2.98%

-3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.74%

+0.16%

Volatility

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) at 3.18%. This indicates that DEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEM.LDGRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

3.18%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

8.41%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

11.31%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.31%

14.01%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

15.54%

+0.93%

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEM.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEM.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison

DEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, while DGRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF
3.72%4.47%11.82%9.48%7.05%4.14%9.14%6.10%4.19%3.16%1.48%4.55%
DGRA.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEM.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DGRA.L is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DGRA.L is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEM.L.

DEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DGRA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. DEM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for DEM.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEM.L and DGRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer