PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEFI vs. CBOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEFI vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hashdex Bitcoin Futures ETF (DEFI) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEFI achieves a -25.48% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -2.03% return.


DEFI

1D
-3.06%
1M
-18.64%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.90%
1Y
-38.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CBOL

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
-2.03%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEFI vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DEFI and CBOL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEFI vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEFI
DEFI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DEFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEFI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DEFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEFI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CBOL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEFI vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Bitcoin Futures ETF (DEFI) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEFICBOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

DEFI vs. CBOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEFICBOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

-1.80

+1.75

Drawdowns

DEFI vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEFI drawdown since its inception was -49.60%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -4.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEFI and CBOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEFICBOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.60%

-4.91%

-44.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.13%

-4.64%

-43.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.47%

-3.21%

-13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.34%

Volatility

DEFI vs. CBOL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEFICBOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.85%

3.88%

+39.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.89%

3.88%

+45.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.89%

3.88%

+45.01%

DEFI vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEFI has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEFI vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison

DEFI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DEFI and CBOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for DEFI.

CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for DEFI.

DEFI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Hashdex and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for DEFI and 0.79% for CBOL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEFI and CBOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer