DEFI vs. CBOL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

DEFI (Hashdex Bitcoin Futures ETF) and CBOL (Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEFI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the HDEFI – Hashdex U.S. Bitcoin Futures Fund Benchmark Index, while CBOL is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. DEFI is passively managed, while CBOL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DEFI charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for CBOL.

Performance

DEFI vs. CBOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hashdex Bitcoin Futures ETF (DEFI) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEFI achieves a -26.38% return, which is significantly lower than CBOL's -1.78% return.

DEFI

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 4.35%
• 6M: -15.86%
• YTD: -26.38%
• 1Y: -43.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -4.65%

CBOL

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: -0.55%
• YTD: -1.78%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	$23.76K	$29.60K	$17.43K
DEFI Hashdex Bitcoin Futures ETF	$23.12K	$21.67K	$162.07K

DEFI vs. CBOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DEFI Hashdex Bitcoin Futures ETF	-26.38%	-24.61%
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	-1.78%	-2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DEFI and CBOL is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

DEFI vs. CBOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DEFI

DEFI Risk / Return Rank: 2
DEFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DEFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DEFI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DEFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DEFI Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CBOL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DEFI vs. CBOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hashdex Bitcoin Futures ETF (DEFI) and Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEFI	CBOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.98	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	—	—

Drawdowns

DEFI vs. CBOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEFI drawdown since its inception was -53.19%, which is greater than CBOL's maximum drawdown of -5.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEFI and CBOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEFI	CBOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.19%	-5.05%	-48.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.76%	-4.40%	-44.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.81%	-3.49%	-15.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DEFI	CBOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.71%	3.64%	+41.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.22%	3.64%	+44.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.22%	3.64%	+44.58%

DEFI vs. CBOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEFI has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEFI vs. CBOL - Dividend Comparison

DEFI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOL Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF	1.82%	1.79%
DEFI Hashdex Bitcoin Futures ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEFI and CBOL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, DEFI and CBOL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, DEFI or CBOL?

On fees, CBOL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEFI or CBOL?

CBOL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for DEFI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEFI or CBOL?

CBOL has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.00% for DEFI.

What is the main difference between DEFI and CBOL?

DEFI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Hashdex and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for DEFI and 0.79% for CBOL.