DEDIX vs. EDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund (DEDIX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF).
DEDIX is managed by Delaware Funds. It was launched on Sep 29, 2013. EDF is an actively managed fund by Virtus. It was launched on Dec 23, 2010.
Performance
DEDIX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DEDIX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEDIX Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund | -1.29% | 9.51% | 7.90% | 8.72% | -10.60% | 0.56% | 6.81% | 15.91% | -4.69% | 12.40% |
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | -0.34% | 22.24% | 25.54% | 21.63% | -27.96% | -8.47% | -31.14% | 45.06% | -18.24% | 24.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEDIX achieves a -1.29% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's -0.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DEDIX having a 4.86% annualized return and EDF not far behind at 4.75%.
DEDIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -1.29%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 5.85%
- 3Y*
- 7.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.93%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
EDF
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -5.17%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEDIX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEDIX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DEDIX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank
DEDIX
EDF
DEDIX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund (DEDIX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEDIX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.15 | 0.52 | +1.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 0.76 | +2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.11 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 0.63 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 2.90 | +5.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEDIX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 0.52 | +1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.09 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.20 | 0.16 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.09 | +1.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between DEDIX and EDF is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DEDIX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison
DEDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, less than EDF's 15.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEDIX Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund | 5.78% | 5.76% | 6.69% | 5.40% | 4.96% | 4.42% | 4.38% | 4.31% | 5.59% | 6.04% | 4.02% | 3.54% |
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | 15.06% | 14.49% | 15.32% | 16.71% | 17.31% | 12.91% | 16.46% | 15.67% | 19.37% | 13.58% | 14.75% | 17.93% |
Drawdowns
DEDIX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEDIX drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEDIX and EDF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEDIX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.06% | -64.23% | +44.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -14.17% | +11.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.06% | -53.09% | +33.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.06% | -64.23% | +44.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -18.26% | +15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.44% | -21.61% | +18.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 3.40% | -2.68% |
Volatility
DEDIX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Delaware Emerging Markets Debt Corporate Fund (DEDIX) is 0.77%, while Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that DEDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DEDIX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 5.67% | -4.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.36% | 10.05% | -8.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74% | 17.96% | -15.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.33% | 25.87% | -22.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 30.66% | -26.60% |