PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECZ vs. XBAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DECZ vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DECZ vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DECZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF
-3.57%12.34%18.89%18.32%-8.93%13.75%
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
1.23%13.38%11.55%20.53%-7.59%7.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECZ achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly lower than XBAP's 1.23% return.


DECZ

1D
2.04%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
-3.57%
6M
-1.59%
1Y
11.87%
3Y*
13.04%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*

XBAP

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.52%
YTD
1.23%
6M
3.38%
1Y
12.13%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DECZ vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DECZ and XBAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

DECZ vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECZ
DECZ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
DECZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DECZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAP
XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECZ vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DECZXBAPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.21

-0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.83

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.61

-0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.68

10.81

-5.13

DECZ vs. XBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the XBAP Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECZ and XBAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DECZXBAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.21

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.90

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between DECZ and XBAP is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DECZ vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison

DECZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, while XBAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
DECZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF
3.40%3.28%2.55%1.23%1.44%0.46%
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DECZ vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECZ drawdown since its inception was -16.57%, which is greater than XBAP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECZ and XBAP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DECZXBAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-14.57%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-8.25%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-0.12%

-5.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-1.80%

-1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.23%

+0.91%

Volatility

DECZ vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) at 0.52%. This indicates that DECZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DECZXBAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

0.52%

+3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

1.75%

+5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.99%

10.12%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.59%

9.99%

+2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.48%

9.99%

+2.49%