DECZ vs. NAPR

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

DECZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - DECZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DECZ returned 10.67%/yr vs 9.60%/yr for NAPR. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

DECZ vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECZ achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 10.42% return.

DECZ

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: 6.64%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 1Y: 15.72%
• 3Y*: 14.73%
• 5Y*: 10.67%
• 10Y*: —

NAPR

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.59%
• 6M: 9.93%
• YTD: 10.42%
• 1Y: 15.69%
• 3Y*: 12.04%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECZ vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF	7.94%	12.34%	18.89%	18.32%	-8.93%	20.15%	1.64%
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	10.42%	6.56%	13.29%	30.60%	-12.13%	9.09%	0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DECZ and NAPR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020	0.84

The correlation between DECZ and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

DECZ vs. NAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DECZ	NAPR
Technology	35.3%	50.7%
Financial Services	13.4%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	12.5%
Communication Services	9.9%	15.8%
Healthcare	8.8%	5.1%
Industrials	7.8%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	8.7%
Energy	3.0%	0.7%
Utilities	2.5%	1.6%
Real Estate	2.0%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.3%

Return for Risk

DECZ vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECZ

DECZ Risk / Return Rank: 56
DECZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DECZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
DECZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DECZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
DECZ Martin Ratio Rank: 60

NAPR

NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 97
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECZ vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DECZ	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	3.53	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	5.63	-3.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.81	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	8.81	-6.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.36	45.19	-36.82

DECZ vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECZ and NAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DECZ vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECZ drawdown since its inception was -16.57%, roughly equal to the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECZ and NAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECZ	NAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.57%	-16.53%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-1.79%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.24%	-14.52%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.57%	-16.53%	-0.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.71%	-0.20%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.03%	-2.25%	-0.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	0.35%	+1.53%

Volatility

DECZ vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) at 2.02%. This indicates that DECZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DECZ	NAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	2.02%	+1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.13%	3.79%	+4.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.25%	4.46%	+5.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.70%	11.32%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.40%	10.57%	+1.83%

DECZ vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DECZ and NAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

DECZ vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

DECZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, while NAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF	3.04%	3.28%	2.55%	1.23%	1.44%	0.46%
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECZ and NAPR in my portfolio?

DECZ and NAPR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DECZ or NAPR?

DECZ has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to NAPR (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECZ dropped -16.57% vs NAPR's -16.53%.

Which ETF is better, DECZ or NAPR?

On 5-year performance, DECZ leads with 10.67% vs 9.60% for NAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, NAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DECZ or NAPR?

Over the 5-year period, DECZ has performed better with a 10.67% return vs 9.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DECZ or NAPR?

DECZ and NAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DECZ or NAPR?

DECZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.00% for NAPR.

What is the main difference between DECZ and NAPR?

DECZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NAPR is Nasdaq-100. DECZ tracks S&P 500, while NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.