DECZ vs. EAPR
Compare and contrast key facts about TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR).
DECZ and EAPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DECZ is a passively managed fund by TrueShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Nov 30, 2020. EAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets. It was launched on Mar 31, 2021. Both DECZ and EAPR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DECZ vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DECZ vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF | -3.57% | 12.34% | 18.89% | 18.32% | -8.93% | 13.75% |
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.61% | 14.80% | 2.86% | 8.19% | -5.01% | -2.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DECZ achieves a -3.57% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 0.61% return.
DECZ
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- —
EAPR
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 12.59%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DECZ vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DECZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DECZ vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank
DECZ
EAPR
DECZ vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DECZ | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 1.64 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 2.39 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.46 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.77 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.68 | 13.21 | -7.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DECZ | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.64 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.36 | +0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between DECZ and EAPR is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DECZ vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison
DECZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, while EAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF | 3.40% | 3.28% | 2.55% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 0.46% |
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DECZ vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECZ drawdown since its inception was -16.57%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECZ and EAPR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECZ | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.57% | -17.65% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -6.99% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -0.97% | -4.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -4.18% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 0.94% | +1.20% |
Volatility
DECZ vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) at 1.23%. This indicates that DECZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DECZ | EAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 1.23% | +2.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.69% | 2.42% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.99% | 7.73% | +6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 9.82% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 9.82% | +2.66% |