DECZ vs. BUFP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DECZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF) and BUFP (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds tracking the S&P 500, from TrueShares and PGIM respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DECZ returned 20.18% vs 17.24% for BUFP. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DECZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUFP.

Performance

DECZ vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECZ achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's 6.23% return.

DECZ

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 8.14%
• 6M: 8.12%
• 1Y: 20.18%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 11.21%
• 10Y*: —

BUFP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 6.23%
• 6M: 7.00%
• 1Y: 17.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECZ vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF	8.14%	12.34%	7.33%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	6.23%	12.92%	6.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DECZ and BUFP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024	0.91

The correlation between DECZ and BUFP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DECZ vs. BUFP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DECZ	BUFP
Technology	35.3%	36.2%
Financial Services	13.4%	11.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	10.1%
Communication Services	9.9%	10.9%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.4%
Industrials	7.8%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.2%	4.9%
Energy	3.0%	3.5%
Utilities	2.5%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

DECZ vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECZ

DECZ Risk / Return Rank: 62
DECZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DECZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
DECZ Omega Ratio Rank: 64
DECZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
DECZ Martin Ratio Rank: 63

BUFP

BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 86
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECZ vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DECZ	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.77	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	4.12	-1.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.58	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	3.93	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.35	21.96	-10.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DECZ vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECZ and BUFP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DECZ	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.77	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.40	-0.40

Drawdowns

DECZ vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECZ drawdown since its inception was -16.57%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECZ and BUFP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECZ	BUFP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.57%	-11.98%	-4.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-4.41%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-0.22%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-1.00%	-2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.78%	0.79%	+0.99%

Volatility

DECZ vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 0.95%. This indicates that DECZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DECZ	BUFP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.47%	0.95%	+1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.20%	4.82%	+2.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.57%	6.27%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.59%	9.49%	+3.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.39%	9.49%	+2.90%

DECZ vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DECZ vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

DECZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF	3.03%	3.28%	2.55%	1.23%	1.44%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECZ and BUFP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, DECZ and BUFP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DECZ or BUFP?

DECZ has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to BUFP (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECZ dropped -16.57% vs BUFP's -11.98%.

Which ETF is better, DECZ or BUFP?

On 1-year performance, DECZ leads with 20.18% vs 17.24% for BUFP. On fees, BUFP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, BUFP has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DECZ or BUFP?

Over the 1-year period, DECZ has performed better with a 20.18% return vs 17.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DECZ or BUFP?

BUFP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DECZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DECZ or BUFP?

DECZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.03%, compared with 0.01% for BUFP.

What is the main difference between DECZ and BUFP?

Both ETFs track S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DECZ and 0.50% for BUFP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.