DECW vs. OCTW
DECW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF) and OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DECW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while OCTW is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust. DECW is actively managed, while OCTW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DECW returned 11.17%/yr vs 10.88%/yr for OCTW. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.
Performance
DECW vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DECW having a 4.89% return and OCTW slightly lower at 4.65%.
DECW
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 5.29%
- 1Y
- 15.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- —
DECW vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF | 4.89% | 11.57% | 8.64% | 16.16% | -2.77% |
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF | 4.65% | 9.68% | 8.67% | 17.57% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECW and OCTW is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DECW and OCTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
DECW vs. OCTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DECW
OCTW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DECW
OCTW
Financial Services
DECW
OCTW
Communication Services
DECW
OCTW
Consumer Cyclical
DECW
OCTW
Healthcare
DECW
OCTW
Industrials
DECW
OCTW
Consumer Defensive
DECW
OCTW
Energy
DECW
OCTW
Utilities
DECW
OCTW
Real Estate
DECW
OCTW
Basic Materials
DECW
OCTW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECW vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank
DECW
OCTW
DECW vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF (DECW) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DECW | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.75 | 2.56 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.12 | 3.79 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.53 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 3.43 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.30 | 17.68 | +2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DECW | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 2.56 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 1.48 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
DECW vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, roughly equal to the maximum OCTW drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECW and OCTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECW | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -8.38% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.86% | -3.65% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.76% | -8.38% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -8.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -0.11% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.86% | -0.82% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 0.71% | +0.04% |
Volatility
DECW vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison
Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF (DECW) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) at 0.73%. This indicates that DECW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OCTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECW | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 0.73% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.97% | 3.81% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.58% | 4.92% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 6.29% | +0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 6.14% | +0.97% |
DECW vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DECW and OCTW have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Dividends
DECW vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither DECW nor OCTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DECW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Dec ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.17% |
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, DECW and OCTW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DECW has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to OCTW (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECW dropped -8.76% vs OCTW's -8.38%.
On 3-year performance, DECW leads with 11.17% vs 10.88% for OCTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DECW has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DECW and OCTW have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.
DECW and OCTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DECW is categorized as Options Trading, while OCTW is Defined Outcome.
DECW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DECW and OCTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer