PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECT vs. APRQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECT vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DECT

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.06%
YTD
7.16%
6M
7.61%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
10Y*

APRQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECT vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


DECT vs. APRQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DECT
APRQ

Technology

36.2%
32.0%

Financial Services

11.9%
13.7%

Communication Services

10.9%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

8.4%
10.5%

Industrials

8.1%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.2%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

DECT
36.2%
APRQ
32.0%

Financial Services

DECT
11.9%
APRQ
13.7%

Communication Services

DECT
10.9%
APRQ
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DECT
10.1%
APRQ
11.6%

Healthcare

DECT
8.4%
APRQ
10.5%

Industrials

DECT
8.1%
APRQ
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

DECT
4.9%
APRQ
5.5%

Energy

DECT
3.5%
APRQ
3.2%

Utilities

DECT
2.3%
APRQ
2.5%

Real Estate

DECT
1.9%
APRQ
2.1%

Basic Materials

DECT
1.8%
APRQ
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECT vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECT
DECT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DECT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DECT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

APRQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECT vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Dec ETF (DECT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DECTAPRQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.66

DECT vs. APRQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DECTAPRQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

Drawdowns

DECT vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECT drawdown since its inception was -13.26%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECT and APRQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECTAPRQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

0.00%

-13.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

0.00%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

0.00%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

Volatility

DECT vs. APRQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECTAPRQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.68%

0.00%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.23%

0.00%

+10.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.23%

0.00%

+10.23%

DECT vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECT vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECT nor APRQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, DECT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DECT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRQ.

DECT and APRQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DECT and 0.79% for APRQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECT and APRQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer