PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECP vs. KFEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECP vs. KFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - December (DECP) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECP achieves a 5.60% return, which is significantly lower than KFEB's 10.58% return.


DECP

1D
-1.18%
1M
0.50%
YTD
5.60%
6M
5.12%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KFEB

1D
-1.49%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
10.58%
6M
9.48%
1Y
23.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECP vs. KFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DECP and KFEB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025

0.81

The correlation between DECP and KFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECP vs. KFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECP
DECP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

KFEB
KFEB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
KFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
KFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
KFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECP vs. KFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - December (DECP) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DECPKFEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.37

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

4.12

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.38

14.96

+2.41

DECP vs. KFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECP Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the KFEB Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECP and KFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DECPKFEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.15

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

1.12

+0.20

Drawdowns

DECP vs. KFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECP drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum KFEB drawdown of -14.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECP and KFEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECPKFEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-14.16%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.43%

-5.80%

+0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.49%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-2.32%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.59%

-0.47%

Volatility

DECP vs. KFEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - December (DECP) is 1.83%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - February (KFEB) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that DECP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KFEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECPKFEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

2.80%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.06%

7.83%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.13%

11.09%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.96%

13.31%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.96%

13.31%

-3.35%

DECP vs. KFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than KFEB's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECP vs. KFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECP nor KFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DECP and KFEB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KFEB has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to DECP (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECP dropped -12.12% vs KFEB's -14.16%.

On 1-year performance, KFEB leads with 23.78% vs 19.41% for DECP. On fees, DECP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DECP has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KFEB has performed better with a 23.78% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DECP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KFEB.

DECP and KFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DECP and 0.79% for KFEB.

DECP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECP and KFEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer