DECK vs. FFIV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

DECK (Deckers Outdoor Corporation) and FFIV (F5 Networks, Inc.) are both stocks. DECK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical), while FFIV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 10 years, DECK returned 28.83%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for FFIV. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DECK vs. FFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECK achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly lower than FFIV's 55.20% return. Over the past 10 years, DECK has outperformed FFIV with an annualized return of 28.83%, while FFIV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.87% annualized return.

DECK

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 21.67%
• YTD: 9.80%
• 6M: 12.50%
• 1Y: 12.17%
• 3Y*: 11.65%
• 5Y*: 15.35%
• 10Y*: 28.83%

FFIV

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 9.26%
• YTD: 55.20%
• 6M: 50.82%
• 1Y: 38.22%
• 3Y*: 38.11%
• 5Y*: 15.50%
• 10Y*: 12.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECK vs. FFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation	9.80%	-48.95%	82.30%	67.46%	8.97%	27.73%	69.83%	31.97%	59.44%	44.88%
FFIV F5 Networks, Inc.	55.20%	1.51%	40.50%	24.72%	-41.36%	39.09%	25.99%	-13.81%	23.48%	-9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DECK and FFIV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 1999	0.29

The correlation between DECK and FFIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap DECK : $16.11B FFIV : $22.70B
EPS DECK : $6.98 FFIV : $12.19
PE Ratio DECK : 16.31 FFIV : 32.50
PEG Ratio DECK : 0.59 FFIV : 1.42
PS Ratio DECK : 3.05 FFIV : 9.54
PB Ratio DECK : 6.44 FFIV : 6.22
Total Revenue (TTM) DECK : $5.47B FFIV : $2.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) DECK : $3.16B FFIV : $2.63B
EBITDA (TTM) DECK : $1.31B FFIV : $889.95M

Return for Risk

DECK vs. FFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECK

DECK Risk / Return Rank: 46
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 46

FFIV

FFIV Risk / Return Rank: 69
FFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECK vs. FFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DECK	FFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	1.08	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	1.58	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.21	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	1.04	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	2.28	-1.94

DECK vs. FFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECK Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the FFIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECK and FFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DECK vs. FFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECK drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, roughly equal to the maximum FFIV drawdown of -97.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECK and FFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECK	FFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.36%	-97.59%	+3.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.81%	-34.73%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-64.35%	-34.73%	-29.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-64.35%	-47.42%	-16.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.35%	-54.59%	-9.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.98%	-3.17%	-45.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.35%	-40.16%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.87%	15.77%	+1.10%

Volatility

DECK vs. FFIV - Volatility Comparison

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) at 8.89%. This indicates that DECK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DECK	FFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.35%	8.89%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.08%	24.72%	+6.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.42%	33.48%	+11.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.98%	29.97%	+14.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.47%	29.56%	+12.91%

Dividends

DECK vs. FFIV - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECK nor FFIV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECK and FFIV in my portfolio?

DECK and FFIV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DECK or FFIV?

DECK has higher volatility (10.35%) compared to FFIV (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECK dropped -94.36% vs FFIV's -97.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.