DDV vs. USTB
DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) and USTB (VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds, while USTB is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg 1–3 Year Credit Index. DDV is actively managed, while USTB is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for USTB.
Performance
DDV vs. USTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDV achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than USTB's 1.32% return.
DDV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USTB
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 4.34%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
DDV vs. USTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.12% | 0.47% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 1.32% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDV and USTB is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDV vs. USTB — Risk / Return Rank
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USTB
DDV vs. USTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF (USTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDV | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.78 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.16 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 23.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDV vs. USTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDV drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum USTB drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDV and USTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDV | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -5.32% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -4.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.14% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -0.65% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility
DDV vs. USTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDV | USTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69% | 1.23% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.69% | 2.02% | +0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.69% | 2.00% | +0.69% |
DDV vs. USTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USTB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDV vs. USTB - Dividend Comparison
DDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than USTB's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USTB VictoryShares Short-Term Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 4.49% | 2.54% | 1.84% | 2.59% | 2.69% | 2.32% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDV and USTB have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for USTB.
USTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
DDV is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while USTB is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDV and 0.34% for USTB.
Find the right allocation for DDV and USTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer