PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDV vs. BAMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDV vs. BAMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDV achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than BAMB's -0.85% return.


DDV

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAMB

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDV vs. BAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
2.23%0.71%
BAMB
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF
-0.85%0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DDV and BAMB is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDV vs. BAMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDV

BAMB
BAMB Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDV vs. BAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDV vs. BAMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDVBAMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.06

1.03

+1.03

Drawdowns

DDV vs. BAMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDV drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum BAMB drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDV and BAMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDVBAMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-4.48%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-2.51%

+2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-1.01%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

Volatility

DDV vs. BAMB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDVBAMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68%

3.90%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.68%

4.06%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.68%

4.06%

-1.38%

DDV vs. BAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMB's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDV vs. BAMB - Dividend Comparison

DDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than BAMB's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAMB
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF
2.95%2.85%2.90%0.73%
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
1.21%0.42%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDV and BAMB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMB.

BAMB has the higher dividend yield at 2.95%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDV and 1.09% for BAMB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDV and BAMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer