DDTS vs. ZAPR
DDTS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF) and ZAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
DDTS vs. ZAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTS achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than ZAPR's 3.12% return.
DDTS
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZAPR
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTS vs. ZAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF | 5.14% | 4.57% |
ZAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April | 3.12% | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTS and ZAPR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTS vs. ZAPR — Risk / Return Rank
DDTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ZAPR
DDTS vs. ZAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDTS | ZAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 17.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 79.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTS vs. ZAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTS drawdown since its inception was -4.28%, which is greater than ZAPR's maximum drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTS and ZAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTS | ZAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -1.72% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.19% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -0.09% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.09% | — |
Volatility
DDTS vs. ZAPR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTS | ZAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.55% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.68% | 1.50% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 2.50% | +4.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.68% | 2.50% | +4.18% |
DDTS vs. ZAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DDTS and ZAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
DDTS vs. ZAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTS nor ZAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTS and ZAPR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTS and ZAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
DDTS and ZAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for DDTS and ZAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer