PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDTS vs. XBAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDTS vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDTS achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than XBAP's 7.58% return.


DDTS

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.16%
YTD
4.97%
6M
4.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XBAP

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
7.58%
6M
7.77%
1Y
14.57%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDTS vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDTS and XBAP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDTS vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDTS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XBAP
XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDTS vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDTSXBAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

64.34

DDTS vs. XBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDTS vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTS drawdown since its inception was -4.28%, smaller than the maximum XBAP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTS and XBAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDTSXBAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-14.57%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.69%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-1.73%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

Volatility

DDTS vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDTSXBAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.64%

3.62%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

9.98%

-3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.64%

9.84%

-3.20%

DDTS vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DDTS and XBAP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

DDTS vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTS nor XBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDTS and XBAP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDTS and XBAP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

DDTS and XBAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDTS and XBAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer