DDTS vs. SFLR
DDTS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTS is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDTS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.
Performance
DDTS vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTS achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 5.15% return.
DDTS
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFLR
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 1Y
- 14.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDTS vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF | 6.05% | 4.57% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 5.15% | 5.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTS and SFLR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTS vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank
DDTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SFLR
DDTS vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDTS | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTS vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTS drawdown since its inception was -4.28%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTS and SFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTS | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -12.13% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.99% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -1.74% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.77% | — |
Volatility
DDTS vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTS | SFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.46% | 9.79% | -3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.46% | 10.28% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.46% | 10.28% | -3.82% |
DDTS vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTS vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison
DDTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDTS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | 0.28% | 0.33% | 0.42% | 1.16% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTS and SFLR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDTS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.
SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for DDTS.
DDTS is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTS and 0.89% for SFLR.
Find the right allocation for DDTS and SFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer