PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDS vs. NSSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DDS vs. NSSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDS achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than NSSC's -10.06% return. Over the past 10 years, DDS has outperformed NSSC with an annualized return of 30.59%, while NSSC has yielded a comparatively lower 28.00% annualized return.


DDS

1D
-0.70%
1M
14.47%
YTD
0.66%
6M
-10.45%
1Y
58.44%
3Y*
27.17%
5Y*
35.97%
10Y*
30.59%

NSSC

1D
2.59%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
-10.06%
6M
-10.89%
1Y
33.60%
3Y*
-1.04%
5Y*
17.77%
10Y*
28.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDS vs. NSSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDS
Dillard's, Inc.
0.66%46.81%13.47%32.05%38.66%306.41%-12.71%22.76%0.97%-3.63%
NSSC
Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
-10.06%19.22%4.97%25.59%9.96%90.62%-10.79%86.60%80.00%2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DDS and NSSC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.11

The correlation between DDS and NSSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DDS:

$9.52B

NSSC:

$1.33B

EPS

DDS:

$42.07

NSSC:

$1.03

PE Ratio

DDS:

14.50

NSSC:

36.28

PS Ratio

DDS:

1.45

NSSC:

6.79

PB Ratio

DDS:

3.66

NSSC:

7.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

DDS:

$6.58B

NSSC:

$197.23M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DDS:

$1.82B

NSSC:

$112.37M

EBITDA (TTM)

DDS:

$985.80M

NSSC:

$42.52M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDS vs. NSSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDS
DDS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

NSSC
NSSC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NSSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
NSSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSSC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDS vs. NSSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDSNSSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.18

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

1.31

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.60

3.54

+2.06

DDS vs. NSSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDS Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the NSSC Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDS and NSSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDS vs. NSSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDS drawdown since its inception was -93.62%, roughly equal to the maximum NSSC drawdown of -93.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDS and NSSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDSNSSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.62%

-93.20%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.27%

-25.72%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.02%

-65.43%

+23.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.71%

-65.43%

+15.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.57%

-65.43%

-11.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.84%

-33.82%

+20.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.61%

-38.20%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.47%

9.52%

+0.95%

Volatility

DDS vs. NSSC - Volatility Comparison

Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. (NSSC) have volatilities of 10.15% and 10.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDSNSSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.15%

10.62%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.84%

32.37%

-4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.57%

42.31%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.28%

50.99%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.53%

49.57%

+9.96%

Dividends

DDS vs. NSSC - Dividend Comparison

DDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, more than NSSC's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDS
Dillard's, Inc.
5.11%5.13%6.02%5.18%4.89%6.41%0.95%0.68%0.66%0.57%0.45%0.40%
NSSC
Napco Security Technologies, Inc.
1.56%1.31%1.27%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

DDS vs. NSSC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dillard's, Inc. and Napco Security Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.57B
49.17M
(DDS) Total Revenue
(NSSC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DDS vs. NSSC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dillard's, Inc. and Napco Security Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
60.0%
Portfolio components
DDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NSSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Napco Security Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 29.49M and revenue of 49.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.0%.

DDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

NSSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Napco Security Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.19M and revenue of 49.17M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.

DDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a net income of 250.60M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.

NSSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Napco Security Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of -408.00K and revenue of 49.17M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDS and NSSC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NSSC has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to DDS (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDS dropped -93.62% vs NSSC's -93.20%.

DDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDS and NSSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer