DDS vs. IMRX
DDS (Dillard's, Inc.) and IMRX (Immuneering Corporation) are both stocks. DDS operates in Department Stores (Consumer Cyclical), while IMRX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 3 years, DDS returned 27.17%/yr vs -24.01%/yr for IMRX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DDS vs. IMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDS achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than IMRX's -36.32% return.
DDS
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 14.47%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- -10.45%
- 1Y
- 58.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.17%
- 5Y*
- 35.97%
- 10Y*
- 30.59%
IMRX
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -22.12%
- YTD
- -36.32%
- 6M
- -31.09%
- 1Y
- 113.78%
- 3Y*
- -24.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDS vs. IMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDS Dillard's, Inc. | 0.66% | 46.81% | 13.47% | 32.05% | 38.66% | 40.59% |
IMRX Immuneering Corporation | -36.32% | 199.09% | -70.07% | 51.55% | -70.01% | -17.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDS and IMRX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021 | 0.14 |
The correlation between DDS and IMRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DDS:
$9.52B
IMRX:
$270.92M
DDS:
$42.07
IMRX:
-$293.00
DDS:
3.66
IMRX:
0.00
DDS:
$6.58B
IMRX:
$0.00
DDS:
$1.82B
IMRX:
-$698.89K
DDS:
$985.80M
IMRX:
-$15.38B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDS vs. IMRX — Risk / Return Rank
DDS
IMRX
DDS vs. IMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) and Immuneering Corporation (IMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDS | IMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 1.98 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 3.30 | +2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDS vs. IMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDS drawdown since its inception was -93.62%, roughly equal to the maximum IMRX drawdown of -96.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDS and IMRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDS | IMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.62% | -96.86% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.27% | -57.67% | +33.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.02% | -90.98% | +48.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.84% | -87.24% | +74.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.61% | -77.61% | +42.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 34.56% | -24.09% |
Volatility
DDS vs. IMRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) is 10.15%, while Immuneering Corporation (IMRX) has a volatility of 33.75%. This indicates that DDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDS | IMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.15% | 33.75% | -23.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.84% | 79.00% | -51.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.57% | 124.22% | -84.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.28% | 114.45% | -64.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.53% | 114.45% | -54.92% |
Dividends
DDS vs. IMRX - Dividend Comparison
DDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, while IMRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDS Dillard's, Inc. | 5.11% | 5.13% | 6.02% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 6.41% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.66% | 0.57% | 0.45% | 0.40% |
IMRX Immuneering Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
DDS vs. IMRX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dillard's, Inc. and Immuneering Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
DDS and IMRX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IMRX has higher volatility (33.75%) compared to DDS (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDS dropped -93.62% vs IMRX's -96.86%.
DDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDS and IMRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer