DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DDOC.DE (Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD) and XUHC.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - DDOC.DE tracks the Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health while XUHC.DE tracks the MSCI USA Health Care. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DDOC.DE returned -9.54%/yr vs 6.62%/yr for XUHC.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DDOC.DE charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUHC.DE.

Performance

DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DDOC.DE having a -1.35% return and XUHC.DE slightly higher at -1.34%.

DDOC.DE

• 1D: 4.54%
• 1M: 8.73%
• YTD: -1.35%
• 6M: -5.71%
• 1Y: 0.32%
• 3Y*: -5.09%
• 5Y*: -9.54%
• 10Y*: —

XUHC.DE

• 1D: 2.83%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: -1.34%
• 6M: -1.08%
• 1Y: 12.33%
• 3Y*: 3.62%
• 5Y*: 6.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DDOC.DE Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD	-1.35%	-2.99%	3.18%	-14.12%	-25.03%	-20.13%
XUHC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D	-1.34%	1.47%	8.81%	-0.83%	2.49%	29.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DDOC.DE and XUHC.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021	0.48

Return for Risk

DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDOC.DE

DDOC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9
DDOC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DDOC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
DDOC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9
DDOC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DDOC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9

XUHC.DE

XUHC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 24
XUHC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
XUHC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
XUHC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 23
XUHC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XUHC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DDOC.DE	XUHC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	0.85	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	1.35	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.15	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.01	1.10	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.03	2.69	-2.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDOC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the XUHC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDOC.DE and XUHC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDOC.DE	XUHC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02	0.85	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.39	0.45	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.49	0.56	-1.05

Drawdowns

DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDOC.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than XUHC.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDOC.DE and XUHC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDOC.DE	XUHC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.88%	-26.87%	-33.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.33%	-11.18%	-11.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.67%	-22.19%	-10.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.96%	-22.19%	-31.77%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.22%	-7.48%	-43.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.80%	-5.08%	-36.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.98%	4.57%	+6.41%

Volatility

DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XUHC.DE) at 5.19%. This indicates that DDOC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUHC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DDOC.DE	XUHC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.20%	5.19%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.24%	10.17%	+4.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.70%	14.51%	+6.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.10%	14.42%	+9.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.26%	16.13%	+8.13%

DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDOC.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XUHC.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDOC.DE vs. XUHC.DE - Dividend Comparison

DDOC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUHC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DDOC.DE Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUHC.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D	1.28%	1.29%	1.21%	1.86%	1.63%	0.82%	1.13%	0.96%	0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDOC.DE and XUHC.DE in my portfolio?

DDOC.DE and XUHC.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDOC.DE or XUHC.DE?

On fees, XUHC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDOC.DE or XUHC.DE?

XUHC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DDOC.DE.

What is the main difference between DDOC.DE and XUHC.DE?

DDOC.DE tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health, while XUHC.DE tracks MSCI USA Health Care. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DDOC.DE and 0.12% for XUHC.DE.