PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) and WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRNA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDOC.DE achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than WRNA.DE's 10.48% return.


DDOC.DE

1D
4.54%
1M
8.73%
YTD
-1.35%
6M
-5.71%
1Y
0.32%
3Y*
-5.09%
5Y*
-9.54%
10Y*

WRNA.DE

1D
4.08%
1M
4.18%
YTD
10.48%
6M
10.41%
1Y
48.70%
3Y*
0.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DDOC.DE
Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD
-1.35%-2.99%3.18%-14.12%-25.03%-2.16%
WRNA.DE
WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.48%9.13%-10.92%-3.37%-22.01%-0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DDOC.DE and WRNA.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021

0.73

The correlation between DDOC.DE and WRNA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDOC.DE
DDOC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
DDOC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDOC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

WRNA.DE
WRNA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
WRNA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRNA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRNA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
WRNA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRNA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) and WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDOC.DEWRNA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.30

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

3.61

-3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

9.63

-9.60

DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDOC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the WRNA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDOC.DE and WRNA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDOC.DEWRNA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

1.75

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

-0.20

-0.29

Drawdowns

DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDOC.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than WRNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -52.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDOC.DE and WRNA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDOC.DEWRNA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.88%

-52.35%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.33%

-13.42%

-8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.67%

-40.06%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.22%

-20.73%

-30.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-27.26%

-14.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.98%

5.04%

+5.94%

Volatility

DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Telemedicine & Digital Health UCITS ETF Acc USD (DDOC.DE) is 6.20%, while WisdomTree BioRevolution UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRNA.DE) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that DDOC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WRNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDOC.DEWRNA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

6.73%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

17.21%

-2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.70%

27.70%

-7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.10%

24.22%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.26%

24.22%

+0.04%

DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDOC.DE has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than WRNA.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDOC.DE vs. WRNA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDOC.DE nor WRNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDOC.DE and WRNA.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WRNA.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WRNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DDOC.DE.

DDOC.DE tracks Solactive Telemedicine & Digital Health, while WRNA.DE tracks WisdomTree BioRevolution ESG Screened. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DDOC.DE and 0.45% for WRNA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDOC.DE and WRNA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer