DDNQ vs. LOUP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DDNQ (Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDNQ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. DDNQ is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDNQ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.

Performance

DDNQ vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDNQ) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDNQ

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LOUP

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 15.35%
• YTD: 29.15%
• 6M: 27.05%
• 1Y: 75.12%
• 3Y*: 37.54%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDNQ vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDNQ Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	5.06%
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	26.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DDNQ and LOUP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026	0.75

DDNQ vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DDNQ	LOUP
Technology	50.7%	51.0%
Communication Services	15.8%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.5%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	-
Healthcare	5.1%	2.7%
Industrials	3.3%	20.0%
Utilities	1.6%	2.8%
Basic Materials	1.3%	-
Energy	0.7%	2.9%
Financial Services	0.2%	4.5%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

DDNQ vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 73
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDNQ vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDNQ) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDNQ	LOUP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	0.59	+0.65

Drawdowns

DDNQ vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDNQ drawdown since its inception was -5.65%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDNQ and LOUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDNQ	LOUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.65%	-58.68%	+53.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.16%	+1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-20.03%	+19.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDNQ	LOUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.17%	28.50%	-18.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.17%	32.38%	-22.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.17%	31.96%	-21.79%

DDNQ vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDNQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDNQ vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDNQ nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDNQ and LOUP in my portfolio?

DDNQ and LOUP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDNQ or LOUP?

On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDNQ or LOUP?

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDNQ or LOUP?

DDNQ and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDNQ and LOUP?

DDNQ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDNQ and 0.70% for LOUP.