PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDLS vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDLS vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDLS achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than NTSX's 6.46% return.


DDLS

1D
-1.41%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
4.43%
6M
5.16%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
17.27%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
9.67%

NTSX

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
6.46%
6M
5.53%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
18.24%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDLS vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
4.43%27.97%10.22%15.25%-10.13%17.75%-2.95%24.84%-14.03%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
6.46%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-7.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DDLS and NTSX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2018

0.68

The correlation between DDLS and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDLS vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDLS
DDLS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDLS vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDLSNTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.33

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.69

9.93

-3.24

DDLS vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDLS and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDLS vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDLS drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDLS and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDLSNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-31.34%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.69%

-9.16%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-16.82%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-31.34%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.38%

-3.02%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-6.76%

+1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.14%

+0.81%

Volatility

DDLS vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund (DDLS) is 4.47%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that DDLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDLSNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

5.26%

-0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

10.56%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

13.13%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.82%

17.17%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

18.29%

-2.70%

DDLS vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDLS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDLS vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DDLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than NTSX's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DDLS
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International SmallCap Equity Fund
3.59%3.80%4.11%4.05%5.44%3.18%3.16%3.68%1.75%1.60%3.47%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.10%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDLS and NTSX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NTSX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to DDLS (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDLS dropped -36.80% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, DDLS leads with 9.74% vs 8.85% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DDLS has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DDLS has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DDLS.

DDLS has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.10% for NTSX.

DDLS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DDLS and 0.20% for NTSX.

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDLS and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer