DDGC.L vs. PRWU.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (DDGC.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L).

DDGC.L and PRWU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DDGC.L is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 12, 2025. PRWU.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jan 30, 2019.

Performance

DDGC.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (DDGC.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DDGC.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDGC.L Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc	-0.21%	2.89%
PRWU.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)	0.00%	0.00%

Returns By Period

DDGC.L

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: -0.21%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PRWU.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDGC.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDGC.L has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

DDGC.L

Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc

PRWU.L

Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)

Return for Risk

DDGC.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (DDGC.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDGC.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	—	—

Dividends

DDGC.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDGC.L nor PRWU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	DDGC.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.13%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDGC.L	PRWU.L	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.15%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.15%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.15%	—	—