DDFS vs. LOUP
DDFS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFS is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. DDFS is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
DDFS vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDFS achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 13.81% return.
DDFS
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- 6M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 13.81%
- 1Y
- 38.67%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- —
DDFS vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDFS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September | 4.06% | 3.42% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 13.81% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFS and LOUP is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFS vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
DDFS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LOUP
DDFS vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - September (DDFS) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDFS | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.89 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDFS vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFS drawdown since its inception was -2.29%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFS and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFS | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -58.68% | +56.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -12.90% | +12.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -19.82% | +19.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.58% | — |
Volatility
DDFS vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFS | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 30.55% | -26.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.87% | 32.77% | -28.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.87% | 32.06% | -28.19% |
DDFS vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFS vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFS nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFS and LOUP have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFS.
DDFS and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DDFS is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFS and 0.70% for LOUP.
Find the right allocation for DDFS and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer