DDFM vs. LOUP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DDFM (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - March) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFM is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFM charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.

Performance

DDFM vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - March (DDFM) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DDFM

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LOUP

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 15.35%
• YTD: 29.15%
• 6M: 27.05%
• 1Y: 75.12%
• 3Y*: 37.54%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFM vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DDFM Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - March	3.27%
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	31.63%

Correlation

The correlation between DDFM and LOUP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2026	0.71

Return for Risk

DDFM vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 73
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFM vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - March (DDFM) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DDFM	LOUP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.24	0.59	+1.64

Drawdowns

DDFM vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFM drawdown since its inception was -3.09%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFM and LOUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDFM	LOUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.09%	-58.68%	+55.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.16%	+1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.52%	-20.03%	+19.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDFM	LOUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.89%	28.50%	-22.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.89%	32.38%	-26.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.89%	31.96%	-26.07%

DDFM vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFM has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDFM vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDFM nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDFM and LOUP in my portfolio?

DDFM and LOUP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDFM or LOUP?

On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDFM or LOUP?

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDFM or LOUP?

DDFM and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDFM and LOUP?

DDFM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. DDFM tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), while LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFM and 0.70% for LOUP.