PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFD vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFD vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - December (DDFD) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DDFD having a 3.55% return and SFLR slightly higher at 3.59%.


DDFD

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.35%
YTD
3.55%
6M
4.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SFLR

1D
-2.45%
1M
1.58%
YTD
3.59%
6M
3.63%
1Y
17.46%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFD vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFD and SFLR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025

0.82

DDFD vs. SFLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDFD
SFLR

Technology

36.2%
35.5%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.5%

Industrials

8.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.8%

Energy

3.5%
3.7%

Utilities

2.3%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.1%

Technology

DDFD
36.2%
SFLR
35.5%

Financial Services

DDFD
11.9%
SFLR
11.3%

Communication Services

DDFD
10.9%
SFLR
11.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DDFD
10.1%
SFLR
10.0%

Healthcare

DDFD
8.4%
SFLR
8.5%

Industrials

DDFD
8.1%
SFLR
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

DDFD
4.9%
SFLR
4.8%

Energy

DDFD
3.5%
SFLR
3.7%

Utilities

DDFD
2.3%
SFLR
2.5%

Real Estate

DDFD
1.9%
SFLR
1.6%

Basic Materials

DDFD
1.8%
SFLR
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFD vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFD

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFD vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - December (DDFD) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDFD vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFDSFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

1.63

+0.03

Drawdowns

DDFD vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFD drawdown since its inception was -3.10%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFD and SFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFDSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-12.13%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-2.45%

+1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.43%

-1.74%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

Volatility

DDFD vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFDSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11%

9.26%

-4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.11%

10.23%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.11%

10.23%

-5.12%

DDFD vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFD has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFD vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

DDFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DDFD
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.33%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDFD and SFLR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDFD is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDFD is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for DDFD.

DDFD is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFD and 0.89% for SFLR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFD and SFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer