PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCUIX vs. FLCCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCUIX vs. FLCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS CROCI U.S. Fund (DCUIX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, DCUIX has underperformed FLCCX with an annualized return of 10.44%, while FLCCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.12% annualized return.


DCUIX

1D
0.63%
1M
6.23%
YTD
9.71%
6M
12.66%
1Y
33.50%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
10.44%

FLCCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.16%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCUIX vs. FLCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCUIX
DWS CROCI U.S. Fund
9.71%17.12%17.80%20.81%-15.54%26.39%-12.66%39.03%-11.01%22.00%
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
0.00%18.58%25.08%22.21%-8.85%24.54%7.70%30.36%-9.25%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DCUIX and FLCCX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2015

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between DCUIX and FLCCX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCUIX vs. FLCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCUIX
DCUIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DCUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DCUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCCX
FLCCX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FLCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCUIX vs. FLCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS CROCI U.S. Fund (DCUIX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCUIXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.74

1.83

+0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.93

2.56

+1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.49

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

5.84

-1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.20

10.61

+6.59

DCUIX vs. FLCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCUIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the FLCCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCUIX and FLCCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCUIXFLCCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

1.83

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.71

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.72

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.43

+0.05

Drawdowns

DCUIX vs. FLCCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCUIX drawdown since its inception was -41.94%, smaller than the maximum FLCCX drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCUIX and FLCCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCUIXFLCCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.94%

-65.81%

+23.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-5.10%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.33%

-19.06%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.99%

-22.04%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-37.63%

-4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.23%

+4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-15.48%

+8.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.81%

-0.87%

Volatility

DCUIX vs. FLCCX - Volatility Comparison

DWS CROCI U.S. Fund (DCUIX) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C (FLCCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that DCUIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCUIXFLCCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

0.00%

+3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.53%

4.23%

+4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

8.08%

+4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.25%

16.44%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

18.59%

-0.26%

DCUIX vs. FLCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCUIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCCX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCUIX vs. FLCCX - Dividend Comparison

DCUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.16%, more than FLCCX's 6.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCUIX
DWS CROCI U.S. Fund
10.16%11.15%8.91%1.64%2.76%1.35%2.45%10.23%4.24%2.45%0.31%1.38%
FLCCX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class C
6.79%6.79%6.81%3.27%1.77%6.87%5.44%8.90%18.35%7.06%1.65%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCUIX and FLCCX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCUIX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to FLCCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCUIX dropped -41.94% vs FLCCX's -65.81%.

DCUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCUIX and FLCCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer