DCS.TO vs. DRMC.TO
DCS.TO (Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF) and DRMC.TO (Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DCS.TO is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Desjardins, while DRMC.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Desjardins. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DCS.TO returned 2.13%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for DRMC.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DCS.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCS.TO achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than DRMC.TO's 11.28% return.
DCS.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 3.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- —
DRMC.TO
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 31.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.99%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- —
DCS.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCS.TO Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF | 1.16% | 3.51% | 5.74% | 4.72% | -4.00% | -0.81% | 4.93% | 3.23% | 0.78% |
DRMC.TO Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF | 11.28% | 32.01% | 24.10% | 13.91% | -11.52% | 29.22% | 8.91% | 17.21% | -9.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCS.TO and DRMC.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2018 | 0.03 |
Over the past year, DCS.TO and DRMC.TO have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCS.TO vs. DRMC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DCS.TO
DRMC.TO
DCS.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (DCS.TO) and Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DCS.TO | DRMC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 3.40 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.99 | 13.21 | -5.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DCS.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCS.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.05%, smaller than the maximum DRMC.TO drawdown of -34.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCS.TO and DRMC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCS.TO | DRMC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -34.55% | +27.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.26% | -9.40% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.26% | -12.30% | +11.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.26% | -20.43% | +14.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.14% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -4.50% | +3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 2.41% | -2.02% |
Volatility
DCS.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (DCS.TO) is 0.48%, while Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF (DRMC.TO) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that DCS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRMC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCS.TO | DRMC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 2.60% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.42% | 11.04% | -9.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90% | 13.82% | -11.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.50% | 13.96% | -11.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.64% | 17.37% | -14.73% |
Dividends
DCS.TO vs. DRMC.TO - Dividend Comparison
DCS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than DRMC.TO's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCS.TO Desjardins Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2.59% | 2.49% | 2.66% | 2.49% | 2.41% | 2.47% | 2.55% | 1.69% |
DRMC.TO Desjardins RI Canada - Net-Zero Emissions Pathway ETF | 1.59% | 1.72% | 2.16% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 2.18% | 2.75% | 2.52% | 0.72% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCS.TO and DRMC.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DCS.TO is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DRMC.TO is Canada Equities.
Find the right allocation for DCS.TO and DRMC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer