DCMB vs. ISTB
DCMB (Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF) and ISTB (iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. DCMB is actively managed, while ISTB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DCMB returned 6.20%/yr vs 4.95%/yr for ISTB. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DCMB charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISTB.
Performance
DCMB vs. ISTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCMB achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly higher than ISTB's 0.49% return.
DCMB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISTB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- 1.85%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
DCMB vs. ISTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF | 1.39% | 5.86% | 6.86% | 5.27% |
ISTB iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF | 0.49% | 6.36% | 4.37% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCMB and ISTB is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DCMB and ISTB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCMB vs. ISTB — Risk / Return Rank
DCMB
ISTB
DCMB vs. ISTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DCMB | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.96 | 1.46 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.98 | 3.34 | +3.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.78 | 12.72 | +13.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DCMB | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16 | 2.37 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.90 | 0.84 | +3.06 |
Drawdowns
DCMB vs. ISTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCMB drawdown since its inception was -0.84%, smaller than the maximum ISTB drawdown of -9.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCMB and ISTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCMB | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -9.34% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.68% | -1.26% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.84% | -1.36% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.42% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -1.22% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 0.33% | -0.15% |
Volatility
DCMB vs. ISTB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) is 0.47%, while iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) has a volatility of 0.54%. This indicates that DCMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCMB | ISTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 0.54% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.88% | 1.28% | -0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14% | 1.77% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 2.79% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.58% | 2.51% | -0.93% |
DCMB vs. ISTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DCMB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DCMB vs. ISTB - Dividend Comparison
DCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than ISTB's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCMB Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF | 4.75% | 4.84% | 5.52% | 3.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISTB iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF | 4.25% | 4.12% | 3.83% | 2.97% | 2.01% | 1.69% | 2.20% | 2.75% | 2.57% | 2.06% | 1.90% | 1.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCMB and ISTB have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISTB has higher volatility (0.54%) compared to DCMB (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCMB dropped -0.84% vs ISTB's -9.34%.
On 3-year performance, DCMB leads with 6.20% vs 4.95% for ISTB. On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DCMB has performed better with a 6.20% return vs 4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DCMB.
DCMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 4.25% for ISTB.
They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DCMB and 0.06% for ISTB.
DCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DCMB and ISTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer