PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCMB vs. ERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCMB vs. ERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCMB achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 66.93% return.


DCMB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
10Y*

ERX

1D
2.68%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
66.93%
6M
59.74%
1Y
90.37%
3Y*
23.69%
5Y*
28.75%
10Y*
-8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DCMB vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DCMB
Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF
1.39%5.86%6.86%5.27%
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
66.93%2.79%1.09%-5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DCMB and ERX is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2023

-0.10

The correlation between DCMB and ERX shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCMB vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DCMB
DCMB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DCMB vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DCMBERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.96

1.32

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.98

3.89

+3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.78

10.60

+15.18

DCMB vs. ERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCMB Sharpe Ratio is 4.16, which is higher than the ERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCMB and ERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DCMBERXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16

2.21

+1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.90

-0.09

+3.99

Drawdowns

DCMB vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCMB drawdown since its inception was -0.84%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCMB and ERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCMBERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-99.54%

+98.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.68%

-23.34%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.84%

-42.34%

+41.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-91.57%

+91.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-67.02%

+66.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

8.57%

-8.39%

Volatility

DCMB vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF (DCMB) is 0.47%, while Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a volatility of 16.49%. This indicates that DCMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCMBERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

16.49%

-16.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.88%

33.45%

-32.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14%

41.14%

-40.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.58%

51.98%

-50.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.58%

69.18%

-67.60%

DCMB vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCMB has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCMB vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison

DCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than ERX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCMB
Doubleline Commercial Real Estate ETF
4.75%4.84%5.52%3.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.61%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCMB and ERX have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERX has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to DCMB (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCMB dropped -0.84% vs ERX's -99.54%.

On 3-year performance, ERX leads with 23.69% vs 6.20% for DCMB. On fees, DCMB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DCMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ERX has performed better with a 23.69% return vs 6.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DCMB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.

DCMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 1.61% for ERX.

DCMB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while ERX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DCMB and 1.09% for ERX.

DCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCMB and ERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer