DCBC.TO vs. MFT.TO
DCBC.TO (Desjardins Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF) and MFT.TO (Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. DCBC.TO is passively managed, while MFT.TO is actively managed. Over the past year, DCBC.TO returned 4.44% vs 2.43% for MFT.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DCBC.TO vs. MFT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DCBC.TO achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than MFT.TO's 2.53% return.
DCBC.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFT.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 2.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
DCBC.TO vs. MFT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DCBC.TO Desjardins Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.55% | 3.94% | 6.62% |
MFT.TO Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF | 2.53% | 0.81% | 6.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between DCBC.TO and MFT.TO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DCBC.TO vs. MFT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DCBC.TO
MFT.TO
DCBC.TO vs. MFT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Desjardins Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (DCBC.TO) and Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DCBC.TO | MFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 1.84 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 4.39 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DCBC.TO vs. MFT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DCBC.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.12%, smaller than the maximum MFT.TO drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCBC.TO and MFT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DCBC.TO | MFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.12% | -20.87% | +17.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.57% | -1.33% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | 0.00% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -1.38% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 0.55% | +0.24% |
Volatility
DCBC.TO vs. MFT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Desjardins Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (DCBC.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO) at 0.79%. This indicates that DCBC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DCBC.TO | MFT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 0.79% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 1.80% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.58% | 2.61% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 3.71% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.26% | 5.10% | -0.84% |
Dividends
DCBC.TO vs. MFT.TO - Dividend Comparison
DCBC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than MFT.TO's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCBC.TO Desjardins Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF | 3.79% | 3.55% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFT.TO Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF | 8.29% | 8.57% | 9.44% | 10.40% | 6.26% | 3.89% | 6.18% | 6.97% | 6.14% | 4.84% | 3.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DCBC.TO and MFT.TO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Desjardins and Mackenzie.
Find the right allocation for DCBC.TO and MFT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer