PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DCAIX vs. DNAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DCAIX vs. DNAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund (DCAIX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DCAIX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than DNAVX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, DCAIX has underperformed DNAVX with an annualized return of 3.20%, while DNAVX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.50% annualized return.


DCAIX

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.49%
6M
0.46%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
1.58%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
3.20%
ALL TIME*
2.67%

DNAVX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.62%
6M
-0.88%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
0.93%
3Y*
5.22%
5Y*
3.12%
10Y*
3.50%
ALL TIME*
2.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DCAIX vs. DNAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DCAIX
Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund
0.80%2.47%3.78%0.60%-2.64%1.47%4.11%5.81%4.17%10.40%
DNAVX
Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund
0.36%5.12%6.13%18.70%-14.02%9.29%1.63%13.99%-8.44%8.09%

Correlation

The correlation between DCAIX and DNAVX is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2010

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between DCAIX and DNAVX has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DCAIX vs. DNAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DCAIX
DCAIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DCAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DCAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

DNAVX
DNAVX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
DNAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DNAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
DNAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
DNAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
DNAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DCAIX vs. DNAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund (DCAIX) and Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DCAIXDNAVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.04

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

0.22

+3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

0.65

+12.30

DCAIX vs. DNAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DCAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the DNAVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DCAIX and DNAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DCAIX vs. DNAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DCAIX drawdown since its inception was -46.34%, which is greater than DNAVX's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DCAIX and DNAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DCAIXDNAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.34%

-17.73%

-28.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.49%

-4.26%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.85%

-8.05%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.45%

-17.12%

+11.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.53%

-17.73%

+11.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-3.75%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-3.87%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

1.44%

-1.31%

Volatility

DCAIX vs. DNAVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund (DCAIX) is 0.42%, while Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund (DNAVX) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that DCAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DCAIXDNAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

1.70%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.79%

3.94%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07%

4.44%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.58%

8.62%

-7.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

8.41%

-4.62%

DCAIX vs. DNAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DCAIX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than DNAVX's 1.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

DCAIX vs. DNAVX - Dividend Comparison

DCAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than DNAVX's 11.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCAIX
Dunham Long/Short Credit Fund
3.30%3.79%3.72%4.04%2.63%2.25%2.39%2.27%1.31%1.33%2.28%5.72%
DNAVX
Dunham Dynamic Macro Fund
11.52%11.56%0.00%3.41%0.00%0.00%0.75%0.00%2.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DCAIX and DNAVX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DNAVX has higher volatility (1.70%) compared to DCAIX (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DCAIX dropped -46.34% vs DNAVX's -17.73%.

DCAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DCAIX and DNAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer