PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DC-A.TO vs. BN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DC-A.TO vs. BN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Dundee Corporation (DC-A.TO) and Brookfield Corp (BN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DC-A.TO is traded in CAD, while BN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DC-A.TO achieves a 12.11% return, which is significantly higher than BN's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DC-A.TO has underperformed BN with an annualized return of 1.19%, while BN has yielded a comparatively higher 15.39% annualized return.


DC-A.TO

1D
-3.18%
1M
1.43%
YTD
12.11%
6M
10.94%
1Y
84.42%
3Y*
47.41%
5Y*
23.71%
10Y*
1.19%

BN

1D
-3.36%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
-2.99%
6M
-5.75%
1Y
15.25%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
14.41%
10Y*
15.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DC-A.TO vs. BN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DC-A.TO
Dundee Corporation
12.11%165.73%55.43%-35.21%-0.00%2.16%20.01%26.19%-28.98%-56.78%
BN
Brookfield Corp
-2.99%15.01%56.56%25.77%-30.16%47.95%7.15%45.17%-3.08%25.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DC-A.TO and BN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DC-A.TO:

CA$383.26M

BN:

$103.86B

EPS

DC-A.TO:

CA$3.06

BN:

$0.56

PE Ratio

DC-A.TO:

1.39

BN:

77.69

PEG Ratio

DC-A.TO:

0.01

BN:

170.26

PS Ratio

DC-A.TO:

41.30

BN:

1.35

PB Ratio

DC-A.TO:

0.64

BN:

2.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

DC-A.TO:

CA$9.75M

BN:

$76.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DC-A.TO:

CA$7.75M

BN:

$27.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

DC-A.TO:

CA$292.06M

BN:

$31.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DC-A.TO vs. BN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DC-A.TO
DC-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DC-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DC-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DC-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
DC-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BN
BN Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DC-A.TO vs. BN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dundee Corporation (DC-A.TO) and Brookfield Corp (BN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DC-A.TOBNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.12

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

0.68

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

1.92

+4.32

DC-A.TO vs. BN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DC-A.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the BN Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DC-A.TO and BN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DC-A.TOBNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

0.55

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.50

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

0.55

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.74

-0.61

Drawdowns

DC-A.TO vs. BN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DC-A.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.25%, which is greater than BN's maximum drawdown of -46.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DC-A.TO and BN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DC-A.TOBNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.25%

-46.89%

-47.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.40%

-22.59%

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.57%

-28.93%

-19.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.00%

-36.79%

-23.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.02%

-46.89%

-37.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.85%

-10.07%

-51.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.60%

-7.98%

-41.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.56%

7.95%

+5.61%

Volatility

DC-A.TO vs. BN - Volatility Comparison

Dundee Corporation (DC-A.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to Brookfield Corp (BN) at 9.49%. This indicates that DC-A.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DC-A.TOBNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.11%

9.49%

+4.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.53%

21.81%

+15.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.91%

27.88%

+25.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.51%

28.81%

+20.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.51%

27.87%

+25.64%

Dividends

DC-A.TO vs. BN - Dividend Comparison

DC-A.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BN
Brookfield Corp
0.57%0.52%0.56%0.70%1.44%1.12%1.55%1.11%1.56%1.29%1.58%1.50%
DC-A.TO
Dundee Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.44%30.08%36.62%1.66%7.88%0.00%

Financials

DC-A.TO vs. BN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dundee Corporation and Brookfield Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
4.54M
18.39B
(DC-A.TO) Total Revenue
(BN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DC-A.TO values in CAD, BN values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


DC-A.TO and BN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DC-A.TO and BN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer