DBZB.DE vs. AHYB.DE
DBZB.DE (Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged) and AHYB.DE (Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD) are both Global Bonds funds - DBZB.DE tracks the FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged) while AHYB.DE tracks the Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI Sector Neutral (USD Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBZB.DE returned 0.76%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for AHYB.DE. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBZB.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for AHYB.DE.
Performance
DBZB.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DBZB.DE is traded in EUR, while AHYB.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AHYB.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBZB.DE achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly lower than AHYB.DE's 1.44% return.
DBZB.DE
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- -0.05%
- 3Y*
- 0.76%
- 5Y*
- -2.54%
- 10Y*
- -0.99%
AHYB.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 0.85%
- 3Y*
- 0.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBZB.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBZB.DE Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged | -0.71% | 1.28% | -0.41% | 3.56% | -3.68% |
AHYB.DE Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD | 1.44% | -7.58% | 8.10% | 3.80% | -3.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBZB.DE and AHYB.DE is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2022 | 0.32 |
The correlation between DBZB.DE and AHYB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBZB.DE vs. AHYB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBZB.DE
AHYB.DE
DBZB.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBZB.DE | AHYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.03 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 0.18 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 0.47 | -0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBZB.DE | AHYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 | 0.14 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.06 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
DBZB.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBZB.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.88%, which is greater than AHYB.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBZB.DE and AHYB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBZB.DE | AHYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -12.85% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -4.60% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.14% | -11.29% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.44% | -7.94% | -8.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -7.10% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.80% | -0.54% |
Volatility
DBZB.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II Global Government Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (DBZB.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.48% compared to Amundi Global Aggregate SRI UCITS ETF Hedged USD (AHYB.DE) at 1.34%. This indicates that DBZB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHYB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBZB.DE | AHYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 1.34% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | 4.35% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.86% | 5.90% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 7.95% | -2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 7.95% | -3.21% |
DBZB.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBZB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than AHYB.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DBZB.DE vs. AHYB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBZB.DE nor AHYB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBZB.DE and AHYB.DE have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AHYB.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AHYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DBZB.DE.
DBZB.DE tracks FTSE World Government Bond - Developed Markets (EUR Hedged), while AHYB.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Aggregate 500MM ex Securitized Sustainable SRI Sector Neutral (USD Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DBZB.DE and 0.16% for AHYB.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBZB.DE and AHYB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer