DBXW.DE vs. F50A.DE
DBXW.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and F50A.DE (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds - DBXW.DE tracks the MSCI World while F50A.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBXW.DE returned 12.79%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for F50A.DE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBXW.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for F50A.DE.
Performance
DBXW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DBXW.DE having a 10.90% return and F50A.DE slightly lower at 10.81%.
DBXW.DE
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 10.90%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 23.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 12.75%
F50A.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXW.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 10.90% | 7.77% | 25.74% | 20.10% | -13.86% | 32.72% | -0.47% |
F50A.DE Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating | 10.81% | 8.58% | 25.85% | 19.91% | -13.61% | 32.73% | -0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXW.DE and F50A.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DBXW.DE and F50A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXW.DE vs. F50A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXW.DE
F50A.DE
DBXW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBXW.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 3.66 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.33 | 14.61 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBXW.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.17 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.71 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
DBXW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXW.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.36%, which is greater than F50A.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXW.DE and F50A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXW.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.36% | -32.88% | -20.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -6.62% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.66% | -21.49% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.66% | -21.49% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.39% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -4.72% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | 1.66% | -0.01% |
Volatility
DBXW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Swap UCITS ETF 1C (DBXW.DE) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF Accumulating (F50A.DE) have volatilities of 2.60% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXW.DE | F50A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 2.63% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 7.95% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 11.18% | -0.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 14.60% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 17.70% | -2.16% |
DBXW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXW.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than F50A.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBXW.DE vs. F50A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBXW.DE nor F50A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, DBXW.DE and F50A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, F50A.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
F50A.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBXW.DE.
DBXW.DE tracks MSCI World, while F50A.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for DBXW.DE and 0.05% for F50A.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXW.DE and F50A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer