PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (X03B.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXQ.DE achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than X03B.DE's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXQ.DE has underperformed X03B.DE with an annualized return of 0.21%, while X03B.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 0.23% annualized return.


DBXQ.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
0.64%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
-0.28%
10Y*
0.21%

X03B.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.05%
6M
0.20%
1Y
0.95%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
0.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBXQ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF
-0.05%2.57%2.23%5.50%-10.12%-1.37%1.56%2.56%-0.06%-0.19%
X03B.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF
0.05%2.25%3.05%3.35%-4.64%-0.79%-0.13%0.14%-0.34%-0.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXQ.DE and X03B.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 10, 2012

0.85

The correlation between DBXQ.DE and X03B.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXQ.DE
DBXQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DBXQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

X03B.DE
X03B.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
X03B.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
X03B.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
X03B.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
X03B.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
X03B.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE) and Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (X03B.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBXQ.DEX03B.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.13

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

0.63

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.38

2.04

-1.66

DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the X03B.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXQ.DE and X03B.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBXQ.DEX03B.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

0.62

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.41

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.17

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.57

+0.10

Drawdowns

DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.25%, which is greater than X03B.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXQ.DE and X03B.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXQ.DEX03B.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-6.78%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-1.28%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.41%

-1.28%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.13%

-5.67%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.25%

-6.78%

-5.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-0.51%

-1.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-1.19%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.40%

+0.46%

Volatility

DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF (DBXQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (X03B.DE) at 0.50%. This indicates that DBXQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than X03B.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXQ.DEX03B.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.50%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.30%

1.20%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60%

1.30%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

1.63%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.31%

1.32%

+1.99%

DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DBXQ.DE and X03B.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBXQ.DE vs. X03B.DE - Dividend Comparison

DBXQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while X03B.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXQ.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Government Bond 3-5 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
X03B.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF
1.53%1.39%0.98%0.28%0.12%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXQ.DE and X03B.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXQ.DE and X03B.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

DBXQ.DE tracks Markit iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 3-5, while X03B.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 1-3.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXQ.DE and X03B.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer