PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) and iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF (EUN9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXP.DE achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than EUN9.DE's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXP.DE has outperformed EUN9.DE with an annualized return of 0.22%, while EUN9.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 0.08% annualized return.


DBXP.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.04%
6M
0.12%
1Y
0.80%
3Y*
2.61%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
0.22%

EUN9.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.50%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
0.41%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
-1.15%
10Y*
0.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBXP.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF
0.04%2.21%2.99%3.41%-4.59%-0.85%-0.18%0.17%-0.37%-0.45%
EUN9.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF
-0.02%2.45%1.87%6.90%-14.78%-1.90%2.71%4.34%0.55%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXP.DE and EUN9.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2009

0.66

The correlation between DBXP.DE and EUN9.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXP.DE
DBXP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DBXP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

EUN9.DE
EUN9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EUN9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUN9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUN9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
EUN9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUN9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) and iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF (EUN9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBXP.DEEUN9.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.02

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

0.12

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

0.33

+1.74

DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the EUN9.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXP.DE and EUN9.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBXP.DEEUN9.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

0.10

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

-0.21

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.02

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.34

+0.22

Drawdowns

DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXP.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, smaller than the maximum EUN9.DE drawdown of -17.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXP.DE and EUN9.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXP.DEEUN9.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-17.43%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

-3.42%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

-3.42%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.67%

-17.35%

+11.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.77%

-17.43%

+10.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-7.00%

+6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-3.80%

+2.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

1.23%

-0.84%

Volatility

DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) is 0.46%, while iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF (EUN9.DE) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that DBXP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUN9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXP.DEEUN9.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

1.57%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.11%

3.45%

-2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22%

3.96%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.65%

5.41%

-3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.80%

4.32%

-2.52%

DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DBXP.DE and EUN9.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBXP.DE vs. EUN9.DE - Dividend Comparison

DBXP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUN9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBXP.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EUN9.DE
iShares Euro Government Bond 5-7yr UCITS ETF
2.66%2.66%2.53%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.14%0.49%0.35%0.23%0.53%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXP.DE and EUN9.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXP.DE and EUN9.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

DBXP.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 1-3, while EUN9.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 5-7. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXP.DE and EUN9.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer