PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) and iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (CBUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXP.DE achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly higher than CBUS.DE's -1.94% return.


DBXP.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.04%
6M
0.12%
1Y
0.80%
3Y*
2.61%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
0.22%

CBUS.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
1.30%
YTD
-1.94%
6M
-2.08%
1Y
0.09%
3Y*
0.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DBXP.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF
0.04%2.21%2.99%3.41%-0.39%
CBUS.DE
iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
-1.94%3.15%-5.02%2.14%5.57%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXP.DE and CBUS.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2022

0.58

The correlation between DBXP.DE and CBUS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXP.DE
DBXP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DBXP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUS.DE
CBUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) and iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (CBUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBXP.DECBUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.01

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

0.02

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

0.04

+2.03

DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the CBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXP.DE and CBUS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBXP.DECBUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

0.01

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.12

+0.44

Drawdowns

DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXP.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, smaller than the maximum CBUS.DE drawdown of -12.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXP.DE and CBUS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXP.DECBUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-12.79%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.24%

-5.66%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.24%

-7.48%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-7.94%

+7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.00%

-7.22%

+6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

2.18%

-1.79%

Volatility

DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF (DBXP.DE) is 0.46%, while iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (CBUS.DE) has a volatility of 2.39%. This indicates that DBXP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXP.DECBUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

2.39%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.11%

4.93%

-3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22%

6.13%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.65%

8.34%

-6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.80%

8.34%

-6.54%

DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXP.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUS.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBXP.DE vs. CBUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

DBXP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBUS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CBUS.DE
iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist
4.52%4.23%3.74%2.40%0.13%
DBXP.DE
Xtrackers Eurozone Government Bond 1-3 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXP.DE and CBUS.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUS.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for DBXP.DE.

DBXP.DE tracks iBoxx® EUR Eurozone 1-3, while CBUS.DE tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for DBXP.DE and 0.09% for CBUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXP.DE and CBUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer