DBXJ.DE vs. QDVY.DE
DBXJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) and QDVY.DE (iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBXJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan, while QDVY.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes 1-5. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DBXJ.DE returned 10.26%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for QDVY.DE. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBXJ.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for QDVY.DE.
Performance
DBXJ.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXJ.DE achieves a 18.87% return, which is significantly higher than QDVY.DE's 5.04% return.
DBXJ.DE
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 12.46%
- YTD
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 38.28%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
QDVY.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 6.21%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- —
DBXJ.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 18.87% | 12.58% | 13.75% | 16.43% | -12.41% | 9.99% | 5.08% | 21.75% | -9.54% | 8.60% |
QDVY.DE iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF | 5.04% | -6.57% | 12.71% | 2.90% | 7.46% | 9.00% | -8.10% | 6.74% | 5.86% | -15.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXJ.DE and QDVY.DE is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2017 | 0.12 |
The correlation between DBXJ.DE and QDVY.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXJ.DE vs. QDVY.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXJ.DE
QDVY.DE
DBXJ.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBXJ.DE | QDVY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 1.92 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 4.65 | +7.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBXJ.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.22%, which is greater than QDVY.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXJ.DE and QDVY.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXJ.DE | QDVY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.22% | -19.19% | -32.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -3.21% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.95% | -11.29% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.01% | -11.29% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.89% | -4.24% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -7.35% | -7.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | 1.33% | +1.83% |
Volatility
DBXJ.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (QDVY.DE) at 1.87%. This indicates that DBXJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXJ.DE | QDVY.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 1.87% | +4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.03% | 4.36% | +11.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 6.14% | +13.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.80% | 7.84% | +8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 9.01% | +7.41% |
DBXJ.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXJ.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVY.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DBXJ.DE vs. QDVY.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBXJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDVY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QDVY.DE iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.61% | 5.18% | 5.89% | 5.61% | 1.50% | 0.57% | 1.75% | 2.94% | 2.20% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXJ.DE and QDVY.DE have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QDVY.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QDVY.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for DBXJ.DE.
DBXJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while QDVY.DE is Corporate Bonds. DBXJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while QDVY.DE tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes 1-5. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DBXJ.DE and 0.10% for QDVY.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXJ.DE and QDVY.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer