DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DBXJ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) and LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBXJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan, while LSMC.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBXJ.DE returned 9.20%/yr vs 28.49%/yr for LSMC.DE. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBXJ.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LSMC.DE.

Performance

DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXJ.DE achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 63.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXJ.DE has underperformed LSMC.DE with an annualized return of 9.20%, while LSMC.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 28.49% annualized return.

DBXJ.DE

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 6.00%
• YTD: 16.95%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 30.73%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 10.09%
• 10Y*: 9.20%

LSMC.DE

• 1D: -3.34%
• 1M: 16.45%
• YTD: 63.83%
• 6M: 64.57%
• 1Y: 130.64%
• 3Y*: 62.06%
• 5Y*: 36.20%
• 10Y*: 28.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBXJ.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C	16.95%	12.59%	13.75%	16.43%	-12.07%	9.57%	5.08%	21.75%	-9.54%	9.08%
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF	63.83%	32.60%	66.54%	74.46%	-34.66%	37.56%	23.03%	39.73%	-5.73%	12.36%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXJ.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2008	0.49

The correlation between DBXJ.DE and LSMC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXJ.DE

DBXJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 54
DBXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
DBXJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
DBXJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DBXJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
DBXJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

LSMC.DE

LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBXJ.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	4.27	-2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	4.60	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.59	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	10.37	-7.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.82	32.83	-23.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXJ.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBXJ.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	4.27	-2.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	1.15	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	1.09	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.82	-0.55

Drawdowns

DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.22%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXJ.DE and LSMC.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBXJ.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.22%	-39.77%	-11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.22%	-12.53%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.96%	-36.22%	+19.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.00%	-39.77%	+20.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.03%	-39.77%	+11.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	-3.34%	+2.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.63%	-9.37%	-5.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.12%	3.96%	-0.84%

Volatility

DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (DBXJ.DE) is 3.40%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that DBXJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBXJ.DE	LSMC.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	11.23%	-7.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.91%	22.18%	-7.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.74%	30.40%	-11.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.56%	31.21%	-14.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.38%	26.06%	-9.68%

DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXJ.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBXJ.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBXJ.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBXJ.DE and LSMC.DE in my portfolio?

DBXJ.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DBXJ.DE or LSMC.DE?

On fees, DBXJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBXJ.DE or LSMC.DE?

DBXJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

What is the main difference between DBXJ.DE and LSMC.DE?

DBXJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. DBXJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DBXJ.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.