DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DBXI.DE (Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF) and AMES.DE (Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR) are both Europe Equities funds - DBXI.DE tracks the FTSE MIB while AMES.DE tracks the MSCI Spain. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBXI.DE returned 14.91%/yr vs 11.05%/yr for AMES.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBXI.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMES.DE.

Performance

DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXI.DE achieves a 14.49% return, which is significantly higher than AMES.DE's 7.00% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXI.DE has outperformed AMES.DE with an annualized return of 14.91%, while AMES.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.05% annualized return.

DBXI.DE

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: 14.49%
• 6M: 18.42%
• 1Y: 29.63%
• 3Y*: 28.95%
• 5Y*: 19.73%
• 10Y*: 14.91%

AMES.DE

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.60%
• YTD: 7.00%
• 6M: 10.82%
• 1Y: 33.98%
• 3Y*: 29.84%
• 5Y*: 19.21%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF	14.49%	37.50%	18.27%	33.40%	-9.08%	26.51%	-4.28%	33.02%	-14.48%	16.46%
AMES.DE Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR	7.00%	55.41%	19.00%	25.94%	0.03%	6.96%	-12.87%	15.76%	-12.77%	11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXI.DE and AMES.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011	0.70

The correlation between DBXI.DE and AMES.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (10 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXI.DE

DBXI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 60
DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
DBXI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
DBXI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 56
DBXI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DBXI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

AMES.DE

AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 64
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBXI.DE	AMES.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.06	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.83	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	3.40	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.42	11.80	-0.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXI.DE and AMES.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBXI.DE	AMES.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.06	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.09	1.20	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.62	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.48	-0.28

Drawdowns

DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXI.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.49%, which is greater than AMES.DE's maximum drawdown of -40.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXI.DE and AMES.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBXI.DE	AMES.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.49%	-40.98%	-28.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.62%	-9.95%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.56%	-12.58%	-4.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.10%	-17.77%	-7.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.46%	-40.98%	+0.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.77%	-0.52%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.56%	-9.76%	-19.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	2.87%	-0.20%

Volatility

DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) and Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) have volatilities of 4.63% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBXI.DE	AMES.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.63%	4.59%	+0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.34%	13.65%	-1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	16.43%	-0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.31%	18.01%	+0.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.37%	20.82%	-0.45%

DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXI.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DBXI.DE vs. AMES.DE - Dividend Comparison

DBXI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, while AMES.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMES.DE Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DBXI.DE Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF	3.63%	3.93%	4.53%	3.78%	7.45%	0.94%	4.23%	3.33%	2.66%	1.94%	2.51%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DBXI.DE and AMES.DE in my portfolio?

DBXI.DE and AMES.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DBXI.DE or AMES.DE?

On fees, AMES.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DBXI.DE or AMES.DE?

AMES.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DBXI.DE.

What is the main difference between DBXI.DE and AMES.DE?

DBXI.DE tracks FTSE MIB, while AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for DBXI.DE and 0.25% for AMES.DE.