PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXD.DE achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than PR1Z.DE's 11.71% return.


DBXD.DE

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.43%
6M
-1.52%
YTD
1.61%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
9.43%
10Y*
9.02%

PR1Z.DE

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.13%
6M
7.95%
YTD
11.71%
1Y
22.09%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBXD.DE
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
1.61%22.65%18.18%19.60%-12.74%15.26%3.11%17.55%
PR1Z.DE
Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)
11.71%24.78%9.45%19.41%-12.44%27.38%-4.63%22.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXD.DE and PR1Z.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019

0.93

The correlation between DBXD.DE and PR1Z.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXD.DE
DBXD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1Z.DE
PR1Z.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1Z.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBXD.DEPR1Z.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.28

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

2.13

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

8.01

-7.13

DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the PR1Z.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXD.DE and PR1Z.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.83%, which is greater than PR1Z.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXD.DE and PR1Z.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXD.DEPR1Z.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.83%

-39.55%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-10.31%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.92%

-15.67%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.70%

-24.21%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-2.31%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.28%

-5.54%

-5.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

2.75%

+1.19%

Volatility

DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1Z.DE) at 4.11%. This indicates that DBXD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1Z.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXD.DEPR1Z.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.11%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.60%

12.61%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

14.78%

+1.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

16.31%

+0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.10%

18.65%

-0.55%

DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXD.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1Z.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DBXD.DE vs. PR1Z.DE - Dividend Comparison

DBXD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1Z.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DBXD.DE
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PR1Z.DE
Amundi Prime Eurozone UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.26%2.53%2.77%2.80%3.09%1.83%2.11%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXD.DE and PR1Z.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1Z.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1Z.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for DBXD.DE.

DBXD.DE tracks DAX®, while PR1Z.DE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets Eurozone Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DBXD.DE and 0.05% for PR1Z.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXD.DE and PR1Z.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer