PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXD.DE achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than ETL2.DE's 18.23% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXD.DE has outperformed ETL2.DE with an annualized return of 8.92%, while ETL2.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.17% annualized return.


DBXD.DE

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.35%
6M
3.40%
1Y
2.06%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
8.92%

ETL2.DE

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.52%
YTD
18.23%
6M
18.72%
1Y
27.69%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBXD.DE
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
1.35%22.65%18.18%19.60%-12.74%15.26%3.11%24.69%-18.52%12.12%
ETL2.DE
L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF
18.23%4.89%11.54%-9.44%24.86%46.17%-7.55%10.85%-4.21%-9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXD.DE and ETL2.DE is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010

0.18

The correlation between DBXD.DE and ETL2.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXD.DE
DBXD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ETL2.DE
ETL2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETL2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBXD.DEETL2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.33

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

3.59

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.58

8.20

-7.62

DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the ETL2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXD.DE and ETL2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBXD.DEETL2.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

1.87

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.84

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.59

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.25

+0.06

Drawdowns

DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.98%, which is greater than ETL2.DE's maximum drawdown of -47.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXD.DE and ETL2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXD.DEETL2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.98%

-47.04%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-7.90%

-4.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.92%

-15.06%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.70%

-23.27%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.83%

-26.50%

-12.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-3.57%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.34%

-21.90%

+10.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

3.46%

+0.51%

Volatility

DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (ETL2.DE) at 4.60%. This indicates that DBXD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETL2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXD.DEETL2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

4.60%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.95%

12.74%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

15.15%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

15.44%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

13.69%

+4.66%

DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXD.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ETL2.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBXD.DE vs. ETL2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBXD.DE nor ETL2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXD.DE and ETL2.DE have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ETL2.DE.

DBXD.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while ETL2.DE is Commodities. DBXD.DE tracks DAX®, while ETL2.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DBXD.DE and 0.30% for ETL2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXD.DE and ETL2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer