DBXD.DE vs. DFEN.DE
DBXD.DE (Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C) and DFEN.DE (VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A) are both exchange-traded funds - DBXD.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the DAX®, while DFEN.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DBXD.DE returned 2.31% vs 14.03% for DFEN.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBXD.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DFEN.DE.
Performance
DBXD.DE vs. DFEN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBXD.DE achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than DFEN.DE's 4.02% return.
DBXD.DE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 2.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
DFEN.DE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.33%
- YTD
- 4.02%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBXD.DE vs. DFEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DBXD.DE Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C | 1.35% | 22.65% | 18.18% | 3.39% |
DFEN.DE VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A | 4.02% | 50.76% | 51.97% | 8.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBXD.DE and DFEN.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBXD.DE vs. DFEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBXD.DE
DFEN.DE
DBXD.DE vs. DFEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBXD.DE | DFEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.11 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 0.75 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.58 | 1.81 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBXD.DE | DFEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 0.56 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 1.75 | -1.44 |
Drawdowns
DBXD.DE vs. DFEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.98%, which is greater than DFEN.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXD.DE and DFEN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBXD.DE | DFEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.98% | -18.60% | -36.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -18.60% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -15.21% | +12.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.34% | -3.27% | -8.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 7.72% | -3.75% |
Volatility
DBXD.DE vs. DFEN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) is 5.10%, while VanEck Defense UCITS ETF A (DFEN.DE) has a volatility of 7.38%. This indicates that DBXD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBXD.DE | DFEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 7.38% | -2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 19.16% | -6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.13% | 24.79% | -8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 21.47% | -4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 21.47% | -3.12% |
DBXD.DE vs. DFEN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBXD.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEN.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBXD.DE vs. DFEN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBXD.DE nor DFEN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBXD.DE and DFEN.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DFEN.DE.
DBXD.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while DFEN.DE is Aerospace & Defense. DBXD.DE tracks DAX®, while DFEN.DE tracks MarketVector Global Defense Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DBXD.DE and 0.55% for DFEN.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBXD.DE and DFEN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer