PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBXD.DE vs. DBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBXD.DE vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DBXD.DE is traded in EUR, while DBC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBXD.DE achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 24.47% return. Over the past 10 years, DBXD.DE has outperformed DBC with an annualized return of 9.92%, while DBC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.50% annualized return.


DBXD.DE

1D
1.10%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
1.61%
6M
2.39%
1Y
5.95%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
9.92%

DBC

1D
1.75%
1M
-8.24%
YTD
24.47%
6M
23.32%
1Y
30.77%
3Y*
8.76%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
7.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBXD.DE vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBXD.DE
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
1.61%22.65%18.18%19.60%-12.74%15.26%3.11%24.69%-18.52%12.12%
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
24.47%-4.72%8.93%-9.01%26.73%51.93%-15.43%14.37%-7.48%-8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between DBXD.DE and DBC is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2007

0.18

The correlation between DBXD.DE and DBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBXD.DE vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBXD.DE
DBXD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBXD.DE vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBXD.DEDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.27

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

2.13

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

8.03

-6.54

DBXD.DE vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBXD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBXD.DE and DBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBXD.DE vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBXD.DE drawdown since its inception was -54.83%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -65.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBXD.DE and DBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBXD.DEDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.83%

-65.73%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.32%

-14.49%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.92%

-17.61%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.70%

-29.98%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.83%

-38.20%

-0.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-13.00%

+10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.30%

-36.02%

+24.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

3.84%

+0.14%

Volatility

DBXD.DE vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C (DBXD.DE) is 3.45%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that DBXD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBXD.DEDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

5.38%

-1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.07%

17.35%

-4.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

20.09%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

20.06%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

18.57%

-0.43%

DBXD.DE vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBXD.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBXD.DE vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

DBXD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.76%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%
DBXD.DE
Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBXD.DE and DBC have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DBXD.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DBXD.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.

DBXD.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while DBC is Commodities. DBXD.DE tracks DAX®, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DBXD.DE and 0.85% for DBC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBXD.DE and DBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer