PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EM Europe Middle East & Africa Swap UCITS ETF (DBX4.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DBX4.DE
Xtrackers MSCI EM Europe Middle East & Africa Swap UCITS ETF
-0.93%26.97%16.81%0.20%1.24%15.56%
XNAS.DE
Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C
-4.26%7.11%33.75%51.36%-29.99%33.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBX4.DE achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly higher than XNAS.DE's -4.26% return.


DBX4.DE

1D
2.31%
1M
-7.60%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
7.77%
1Y
20.75%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
6.66%

XNAS.DE

1D
2.51%
1M
-2.50%
YTD
-4.26%
6M
-1.23%
1Y
16.11%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBX4.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XNAS.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBX4.DE
DBX4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
DBX4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBX4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBX4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DBX4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBX4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XNAS.DE
XNAS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNAS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EM Europe Middle East & Africa Swap UCITS ETF (DBX4.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBX4.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

0.78

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

1.19

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.59

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.08

4.66

+1.42

DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBX4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the XNAS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBX4.DE and XNAS.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBX4.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.78

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.67

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.68

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between DBX4.DE and XNAS.DE is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBX4.DE nor XNAS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBX4.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, which is greater than XNAS.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX4.DE and XNAS.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBX4.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.48%

-31.25%

-29.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.73%

-13.38%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-31.25%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.62%

-7.59%

-3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.09%

-8.04%

-8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

3.42%

+0.41%

Volatility

DBX4.DE vs. XNAS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EM Europe Middle East & Africa Swap UCITS ETF (DBX4.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAS.DE) at 5.03%. This indicates that DBX4.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNAS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBX4.DEXNAS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

5.03%

+4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

11.91%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.54%

20.75%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

19.90%

-3.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

19.94%

+0.88%