DBX4.DE vs. XDEQ.DE
DBX4.DE (Xtrackers MSCI EM Europe Middle East & Africa Swap UCITS ETF) and XDEQ.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - DBX4.DE is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI EM EMEA Low Carbon SRI Selection Capped Index, while XDEQ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX4.DE returned 6.92%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for XDEQ.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DBX4.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDEQ.DE.
Performance
DBX4.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX4.DE achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly lower than XDEQ.DE's 9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX4.DE has underperformed XDEQ.DE with an annualized return of 6.92%, while XDEQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.
DBX4.DE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 22.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.89%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
XDEQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 19.01%
- 3Y*
- 15.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.42%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
DBX4.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX4.DE Xtrackers MSCI EM Europe Middle East & Africa Swap UCITS ETF | 2.42% | 26.97% | 16.81% | 0.20% | 1.24% | 17.99% | -15.66% | 17.52% | -12.44% | 8.88% |
XDEQ.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C | 9.48% | 2.87% | 23.81% | 21.83% | -14.94% | 34.64% | 4.47% | 34.18% | -3.32% | 7.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX4.DE and XDEQ.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014 | 0.47 |
The correlation between DBX4.DE and XDEQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX4.DE vs. XDEQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX4.DE
XDEQ.DE
DBX4.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EM Europe Middle East & Africa Swap UCITS ETF (DBX4.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX4.DE | XDEQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 3.04 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.76 | 12.17 | -7.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX4.DE | XDEQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.78 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.80 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.85 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.80 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
DBX4.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX4.DE drawdown since its inception was -60.48%, which is greater than XDEQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX4.DE and XDEQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX4.DE | XDEQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.48% | -32.16% | -28.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | -6.22% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.82% | -20.59% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | -20.59% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.52% | -32.16% | -8.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | 0.00% | -7.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.01% | -4.75% | -11.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 1.56% | +3.21% |
Volatility
DBX4.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EM Europe Middle East & Africa Swap UCITS ETF (DBX4.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEQ.DE) at 2.36%. This indicates that DBX4.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX4.DE | XDEQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 2.36% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.36% | 7.32% | +10.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.09% | 10.64% | +9.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 14.12% | +3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 15.35% | +5.51% |
DBX4.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX4.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEQ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX4.DE vs. XDEQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX4.DE nor XDEQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX4.DE and XDEQ.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEQ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DBX4.DE.
DBX4.DE is categorized as ESG, while XDEQ.DE is Global Equities. DBX4.DE tracks MSCI EM EMEA Low Carbon SRI Selection Capped Index, while XDEQ.DE tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DBX4.DE and 0.25% for XDEQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX4.DE and XDEQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer