DBSCX vs. EVG
Compare and contrast key facts about Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG).
DBSCX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Aug 3, 2014. EVG is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Feb 28, 2005.
Performance
DBSCX vs. EVG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DBSCX vs. EVG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBSCX Doubleline Selective Credit Fund | 0.30% | 8.46% | 7.78% | 8.55% | -8.10% | 4.13% | 1.83% | 5.68% | 3.03% | 8.75% |
EVG Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund | -0.34% | 8.43% | 14.80% | 11.90% | -14.12% | 17.10% | -1.68% | 16.48% | -7.59% | 10.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBSCX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly higher than EVG's -0.34% return. Over the past 10 years, DBSCX has underperformed EVG with an annualized return of 4.58%, while EVG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.05% annualized return.
DBSCX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.58%
EVG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DBSCX vs. EVG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBSCX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than EVG's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DBSCX vs. EVG — Risk / Return Rank
DBSCX
EVG
DBSCX vs. EVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBSCX | EVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.65 | 0.44 | +2.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.83 | 0.67 | +3.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.10 | +0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 0.77 | +3.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.70 | 2.83 | +11.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBSCX | EVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 0.44 | +2.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.39 | 0.42 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.59 | 0.47 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.57 | 0.34 | +1.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between DBSCX and EVG is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DBSCX vs. EVG - Dividend Comparison
DBSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than EVG's 8.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBSCX Doubleline Selective Credit Fund | 5.92% | 6.50% | 7.09% | 6.77% | 6.67% | 4.68% | 4.64% | 6.04% | 7.43% | 9.01% | 9.73% | 9.53% |
EVG Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund | 8.38% | 8.15% | 8.69% | 9.18% | 12.40% | 8.75% | 6.67% | 6.96% | 6.63% | 6.68% | 7.79% | 8.05% |
Drawdowns
DBSCX vs. EVG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBSCX drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, smaller than the maximum EVG drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBSCX and EVG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBSCX | EVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -40.60% | +26.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.60% | -6.72% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.52% | -23.35% | +13.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.12% | -32.75% | +18.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -2.94% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -6.26% | +5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 1.88% | -1.47% |
Volatility
DBSCX vs. EVG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Doubleline Selective Credit Fund (DBSCX) is 1.00%, while Eaton Vance Short Duration Diversified Income Fund (EVG) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that DBSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DBSCX | EVG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | 4.28% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.53% | 6.09% | -4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29% | 10.89% | -8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.70% | 12.16% | -9.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.90% | 12.95% | -10.05% |